首页> 外文OA文献 >Spinal magnetic resonance imaging with reduced specific absorption rate in patients harbouring a spinal cord stimulation device - A single-centre prospective study analysing safety, tolerability and image quality
【2h】

Spinal magnetic resonance imaging with reduced specific absorption rate in patients harbouring a spinal cord stimulation device - A single-centre prospective study analysing safety, tolerability and image quality

机译:携带脊髓刺激装置的患者的比吸收率降低的脊髓磁共振成像-分析安全性,耐受性和图像质量的单中心前瞻性研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BACKGROUND:Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an accepted treatment in patients with failed back surgery (FBS), complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) and persistent radicular pain following surgery. In order to avoid patient hazards or device malfunction manufacturers advise to abstain from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with implanted electrodes or pulse generators.\udMETHODS:In a prospective study, 13 patients harbouring an implanted Medtronic Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) device underwent MRI (1.5 T) of the lumbar (n = 13), the cervical (n = 2) or the thoracic spine (n = 1) following the development of new spinal symptoms. An adapted MRI protocol was used limiting the transmitted energy and specific absorption rate. Tolerability and safety were assessed by means of a standardized patient evaluation form documenting pain on a visual analogue scale (0-10), neurologic deficit, and discomfort during the scan. In addition, overall satisfaction with the examination procedure was rated on a Likert scale (1-5). Image quality was rated independently and blinded to the presence of a SCS device by the radiologist and the surgeon as equivalent, superior or inferior compared to the standard spine MRI examination.\udRESULTS:None of the 13 patients investigated by the modified spinal MRI protocol experienced new neurological deficits, worsening of symptoms or a defect/malfunction of the implant device. Three patients (23.1 %) reported transient warm sensation in the location of the electrode and in one case intermittent slight tingling in the lower extremities. Overall satisfaction with the examination was 1.13 ± 0.34 according to Likert scale (1-5). The image quality was rated - not statistically significant - slightly inferior to standard lumbar spine imaging (0.82 ± 0.54) with a kappa value of 0.68 between the two investigators. MRI examinations detected relevant and new lesions in 9 (69.2 %) patients which affected treatment in 8 (61.5 %) individuals.\udCONCLUSION:Using a protocol with a reduced specific energy absorption rate, spinal MRI examinations in patients with SCS can be considered safe. The current view that neurostimulators are a general contraindication to MR examinations has to be reconsidered in patients with new or progressive spinal symptoms.
机译:背景:脊髓刺激(SCS)是术后失败的背部手术(FBS),复杂区域性疼痛综合征(CRPS)和持续性神经根痛患者的一种可接受的治疗方法。为了避免对患者造成危害或设备故障,制造商建议对植入电极或脉冲发生器的患者放弃磁共振成像(MRI)。\ udMETHODS:在一项前瞻性研究中,有13位患者植入了Medtronic脊髓刺激(SCS)植入设备在出现新的脊柱症状后,对腰椎(n = 13),颈椎(n = 2)或胸椎(n = 1)进行MRI(1.5 T)。使用了适应性MRI协议来限制传输能量和比吸收率。耐受性和安全性通过标准化的患者评估表进行评估,该表记录了视觉模拟评分(0-10)的疼痛,扫描过程中的神经功能缺损和不适。此外,对检查程序的总体满意度以李克特量表(1-5)评分。影像质量被独立评估,并且放射科医生和外科医生对SCS设备的存在视而不见,与标准脊柱MRI检查相比是同等的,优越的或劣等的。\结果:经改良脊柱MRI协议研究的13例患者中,没有一个经历过新的神经功能缺损,症状恶化或植入装置的缺陷/故障。三名患者(占23.1%)报告电极位置出现短暂的温热感,在一种情况下,下肢出现间歇性的轻微刺痛感。根据李克特量表(1-5),对考试的总体满意度为1.13±0.34。图像质量被评定为-不具有统计学显着性-略逊于标准腰椎成像(0.82±0.54),两名研究者之间的kappa值为0.68。 MRI检查发现9例(69.2%)患者的相关和新病灶影响了8例(61.5%)的治疗。\ ud结论:使用降低比能量吸收率的方案,SCS患者的脊柱MRI检查被认为是安全的。对于具有新的或进行性脊柱症状的患者,必须重新考虑神经刺激器是MR检查的一般禁忌症的当前观点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号